References
1. Rowe V.L., Lee W., Weaver F.A., Etzioni D. Patterns of treatment for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: 1996– 2005. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2009; 49 (4): 910–917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.054
2. Nacional’nye rekomendatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu zabolevaniy arteriy nizhnikh konechnostey. M. 2019; 89. (in Russian)
3. Pokrovskij A.V., Dan V.N., Chupin A.V. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie bol’nyh s kriticheskoj ishemiej nizhnih konechnostej. V kn.: Kriticheskaja ishemija. Itogi XX veka. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa severnyh stran i regionov. Petrozavodsk–Parizh. 1999; 120. (in Russian).
4. Tzouma G., Kopanakis N.A., Tsakotos G., et al. Anatomic Variations of the Deep Femoral Artery and Its Branches: Clinical Implications on Anterolateral Thigh Harvesting. Cureus. 2020; 12 (4): e7867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/10.7759/cureus.7867
5. Choy K.W., Kogilavani S., Norshalizah M., et al. Topographical anatomy of the profunda femoris artery and the femoral nerve: Normal and abnormal relationships. Clinical Therapeutics. 2013; 164 (1): 17–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/10.7417/T.2013.1504
6. Mamatha H., D’Souza A.S., Sylvan A., et al. A cadaveric study on the variations in the origin, course and branching pattern of the profunda femoris artery. International journal of Current Research and Review. 2012; 4 (19): 137–145.
7. Billig D.M., Callow A.D., Deterling R.A. Surgical considerations in the management of lesions of the profunda femoris artery. American Journal of Surgery. 1970; 119 (4): 392–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/0002-9610(70)90139-X
8. Tomaszewski K.A., Henry B.M., Vikse J., et al. Variations in the origin of the deep femoral artery: a meta-analysis. Clinical Anatomy. 2017; 30 (1): 106–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1002/ca.22691
9. Peera S.A., Sugavasi R. Original research article morphological study of branches of femoral artery in the femoral triangle – A human cadaveric study. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research. 2013; 3 (12): 14–19.
10. Prendiville E.J., Burke P.E., Colgan M.P., et al. The profunda femoris: A durable outflow vessel in aortofemoral surgery. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1992; 16 (1): 23–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(92)90413-3
11. Dixit D., Kubavat D.M., Rathod S.P., et al. A study of variations in the origin of profunda femoris artery and its circumflex branches. International Journal of Biological & Medical Research. 2011; 2 (4): 1084–1089.
12. Martin P., Frawley J.E., Barabas A.P. On the surgery of atherosclerosis of the profunda femoris artery. Surgery. 1972; 71: 182–189.
13. Cotton L.T., Roberts V.C. Extended deep femoral angioplasty: an alternative to femoropopliteal bypass. British Journal of Surgery. 1975; 62 (5): 340–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800620503
14. Gavrilenko A.V., Kotov A.Je., Lepshokov M.K. Rol’ plastiki glubokoj arterii bedra v lechenii hronicheskoj kriticheskoj ishemii nizhnih konechnostej. Annaly hirurgii. 2017; 22 (6): 321–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9502-2017-22-6-321-328 (in Russian)
15. Feldhaus R.J., Sterpetti A.V., Schultz R.D. Eversion endarterectomy of the superficial femoral artery and end-to-side anastomosis to the deep femoral artery. An alternative to extended profundoplasty. American Journal of Surgery. 1985; 150 (6): 748–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(85)90422-2
16. Kalman P.G., Hosang M., Johnston K.W. The current role for femorofemoral bypass. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1987; 6 (1): 71–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1987.avs0060071
17. Pearce W.F., Kempczinski R.F. Extended autogenous profundoplasty and aortofemoral grafting: an alternative to synchronous distal bypass. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1984; 1 (3): 455–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(84)90085-5
18. Stern J.R., Bernhard V.M. In the Patient with Profunda Artery Disease, Is Open Revascularization Superior to Endovascular Repair for Improving Rest Pain? In: Skelly C., Milner R. (eds.). Difficult Decisions in Vascular Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33293-2_16
19. Dotter C.T., Judkins M.P. Transluminal Treatment of Arteriosclerotic Obstruction: Description of a New Technic and a Preliminary Report of Its Application. Radiology. 172 (3): 904–920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/172.3.904
20. Werk M., Langner S., Reinkensmeier B. Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries. Paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial. Circulation. 2008; 118 (13): 1358–1365. DOI: doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735985
21. Kavteladze Z.A., Bylov K.V., Drozdov S.A. Angioplastika i stentirovanie poverhnostnoy bedrennoy arterii. International Journal of Interventional Cardioangiology. 2011; 24: 52–53. (in Russian)
22. Schillinger M., Sabeti S., Loewe C. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006; 354 (18): 1879–1888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa051303
23. Pastromas G., Katsanos K., Krokidis M. Emerging Stent and Balloon Technologies in the Femoropopliteal Arteries. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; 2014 (695402): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/695402
24. Dick P., Sabeti S., Mlekusch W. Conventional balloon angioplasty versus peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis: initial experience. Radiology. 2008; 248 (1): 297–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2481071159
25. Dake M.D., Ansel G.M., Jaff M.R. Sustained safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for femoropopliteal lesions: 2-year follow-up from the Zilver PTX randomized and single-arm clinical studies. American College of Cardiology. 2013; 61 (24): 2417–2427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.034
26. Lammer J., Bosiers M., Zeller T. First clinical trial of nitinol self-expanding everolimus-eluting stent implantation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011; 54 (2): 394–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.047
27. Krokidis M., Spiliopoulos S., Katsanos K. Peripheral applications of drug-coated balloons: past, present and future. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2013; 36 (2): 281–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0467-0
28. Tepe G. The THUNDER Trial: 5-Year Results of a Trial Investigating DEB Vs. POBA, Learning International Networks Consortium. Germany: Leipzig. 2012.
29. Taurino M., Persiani F., Ficarelli R. The Role of the Profundoplasty in the Modern Management of Patient with Peripheral Vascular Disease. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2017; 45: 16–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.018
30. Shu J., Santulli G. Update on peripheral artery disease: Epidemiology and evidence-based facts. Atherosclerosis. 2018; 275: 379–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.05.033
31. Manenti A., Roncati L., Manco G. Pathophysiology of the profunda femoris artery in chronic lower limb ischemia. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2021; 77: e2–e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.05.028
32. Qato K., Nguyen N., Bouris Vasilieos Outcomes of Endovascular Management of Isolated Profunda Femoris Artery Occlusive Disease. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2021; 72: 244–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.138
33. Georgakarakos E., Tasopoulou K.-M., Koutsoumpelis A., Georgiadis G.S. The Importance of Profunda Femoris Artery Justifies Further the Endovascular Approach in Critical Limb Ischemia. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2018; 49: 318–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.11.048